|
The "three certified agreements case" was a decision of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. The case resolved the confusion created by the High Court's decision of Electrolux v AWU. ==Name of the case== The "three certified agreements case" (A.K.A.: "In Re Schefenacker" / "The Australian Nursing Federation and the Rural City of Murray Bridge") was a case which combined appeals from single Commissioners decisions not to certify enterprise agreements as they believed that the agreements contained clauses that did not pertain to the relationship between employer and employee. The three agreements were: * The Murray Bridge Enterprise Bargaining Agreement * The Schefenacker Vision Systems Enterprise Bargaining Agreement * The La Trobe University Enterprise Bargaining Agreement. (There has been confusion about how to name the case as it was a combined appeal which is uncommon. It has often been named "The Australian Nursing Federation and the City of Murray Bridge" it has also often been named "Schefenacker" or "in re Schefenacker" to this date no name appears to have been universally adopted.) 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Three certified agreements case」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|